[208] in Project_DB
Oops: Here are the Notes from the project db meeting 8/7/1997
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim McGovern)
Tue Sep 2 16:43:51 1997
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 16:40:39 -0400
To: project-db@MIT.EDU
From: Tim McGovern <tjm@MIT.EDU>
This short have been appended to my previous note...
>Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:59:44 -0400
>To: miki@MIT.EDU, brlewis@MIT.EDU, tjm@MIT.EDU, mbarker@MIT.EDU, wdc@MIT.EDU,
> brendakg@MIT.EDU
>From: Tim McGovern <tjm@MIT.EDU>
>Subject: Notes on the project db meeting 8/7/1997
>
>
>Agenda
>1. Review progress on action items from 7/17 meeting
>
>ACTION ITEM: Mike should do something to project-db/index.html to help
>
>>> Mike has installed an index.html and wants feedback
>>> Mike revised index.html 8/8, and wants feedback
>>> New action items: 1) everyone will review http://web.mit.edu/project-db/
> and send comments to the list; 2) Miki will put the file under
> RCS version control
>
>ACTION ITEM: Brenda will collect dreams and schemes...
>
>>> Brenda has located two articles as background reading for the team
>>> New action item: everyone will read the two articles, and come to the
> next meeting prepared to use these (and other thoughts) as
> input to creating a survey for the project-db customer base.
> We all agreed that the timing for a V3 is probably six months
> away.
>
>ACTION ITEM: Tim will make a list of what needs to be done for V2
>
>>> Tim didn't do anything on this action item, but promised that he
> would RSN. Action item remains operative...
>>> New action item: Brenda suggested putting a project glossary on-line
> within reach of the project-db pages, and everyone agreed that
> was a good idea. Brenda will start to compile just such a thing.
>
>ACTION ITEM: Bruce will refrob the BRL version...
>
>>> Bruce completed the functionality of the system running on OPS-5
>>> to match the latest functionality running on Arachne.
>
>ACTION ITEM: Miki will make sure that the BRL system moves nicely onto
>Arachne.
>
>>> No action on this one yet due to Miki's vacation. She will be working
>>> with Bruce in the next couple of days to begin this transition.
>
>ACTION ITEM: Bill will be quiet and listen patiently while we explain
>these changes from what he thought we were going to do.
>
>>> Done. Oh, right, Bill wasn't there...where's Bill...we missed 'ya!
>>> I guess we need to explain these changes still, eh?
>
>Our next meeting...NOT SCHEDULED:
>
>It looks like there is no week in the next five when all six of us
>will be here.
>
> Options: 1) Per past routine, meet three weeks hence, 8/28
> Tim will be missing
> 2) Meet on 9/11 when both Miki and Bruce will be
> around, but Mike will be missing
> 3) Go back to the well for dates.
>
>Please send me by return post your preference for the above options.
>I vote for #1.
>
