[160] in Project_DB
Re: Release 2.0 possibilities
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert V. Ferrara)
Mon Jul 7 14:05:47 1997
In-Reply-To: <9707071355.AA24098@MIT.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 14:09:28 -0400
To: Brenda Gillingham <brendakg@MIT.EDU>
From: "Robert V. Ferrara" <rferrara@MIT.EDU>
Cc: project-db@MIT.EDU
Brenda & Co,
On the issue of what does does the single Target Date mean, could we
divide it into two parts. In the short term, could we agree on a single
meaning, say, the Target Date to complete the current Process? Please
discuss this and make a recommendation at the July 17th meeting.
For the longer term, Release 2.0 requirements definition, I would hope
that there be even more discussion and input on the meaning and number of
additional date fields.
That would be progress, Cheers, Bob
At 9:55 AM -0400 7/7/97, Brenda Gillingham wrote:
>I forgot to bring this up at the last meeting....
>
>Should we put Bob's request on the agenda for our July 17th meeting, or will
>his request become part of the overall requirements definition for the V2
>effort later?
>
>Brenda
>
>At 18:41 97/06/26 -0400, Robert V. Ferrara wrote:
>>People, at a recent ITLT meeting (where by the way, people are using the
>>Project DB outputs directly) on priorities, someone made the observation
>>that "target date" could mean 1) date to leave the process, or 2) next
>>milestone, or 3) production date. I think we have examples of all three.
>>
>>Please discuss potential solutions as part of next release.
>>
>>Cheers, Bob
>>
>>
>>
