[830] in Kerberos_V5_Development
Re: rearranging krb5 include files: please retain some sanity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Sommerfeld)
Mon Jan 23 01:17:26 1995
To: tytso@MIT.EDU
Cc: krbdev@MIT.EDU, proven@MIT.EDU, eichin@cygnus.com,
John Kohl <jtk@atria.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Jan 1995 17:23:38 -0500 ."
<199501222223.RAA00132@singha.atria.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 01:05:36 -0500
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I guess I agree wholeheartedly with this; I haven't yet seen a
convincing argument that leaving the `#include <krb5/...>' in the .c
source tree is untenable. It should work as-is on UNIX and (I
believe) DOS; and MacOS doesn't have filename length limitations which
would prevent keeping the same names. What OS does this cause
problems for?
Frankly I have enough trouble as it is attempting to convince my
management that tracking MIT's changes to the kerberos tree is a
worthwhile goal... I think that they're convinced now, but with this
change coming along, it will be harder & harder to convince them that
it's OK.
- Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.1
iQCVAwUBLyNHLbT+rHlVUGpxAQFJ2wP+L3lxBHuZIbxN6oqUEExTRal1HyZpof+H
llNKbuPl2GKCgJ0OP64DXWNzLaHeRvY69n1Bs7gANEKvbeyPwMbko2sjiDfcORqI
QAC4lwmNOOE7dUPP51xRftdqzxv/fH+ZgazzSilTS9GEXvdTL0WjMpK2iOegRo9a
oRg9uIH/RHE=
=q2LI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
