[4138] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1435] cygwin does not have inet_ntop when
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken Raeburn via RT)
Wed Apr 23 21:16:00 2003
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <rt-1435-5815.0.94669924564144@krbdev.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <rt-1435@krbdev.mit.edu>
From: "Ken Raeburn via RT" <rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu>
To: krb5-prs@mit.edu
Reply-To: rt-comment@krbdev.mit.edu
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-bounces@mit.edu
If changes are needed in that many places, I'd rather have
port-sockets.h provide an inline version of inet_ntop, to keep the KDC
code simpler, that calls sprintf, since inet_ntoa isn't thread-safe.
Does Cygwin support IPv6 currently?
Do we need to worry about AF_INET6 addresses?
Ken
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
