[4137] in Kerberos-V5-bugs
Re: [krbdev.mit.edu #1435] cygwin does not have inet_ntop when
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken Raeburn)
Wed Apr 23 21:15:58 2003
To: rt-comment@krbdev.MIT.EDU
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:15:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <rt-1435-5797.6.36221463972959@krbdev.mit.edu> ("The RT System
itself via RT"'s message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:42:30 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <tx1k7dksnjv.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: krb5-prs@MIT.EDU
Errors-To: krb5-bugs-bounces@mit.edu
If changes are needed in that many places, I'd rather have
port-sockets.h provide an inline version of inet_ntop, to keep the KDC
code simpler, that calls sprintf, since inet_ntoa isn't thread-safe.
Does Cygwin support IPv6 currently?
Do we need to worry about AF_INET6 addresses?
Ken
_______________________________________________
krb5-bugs mailing list
krb5-bugs@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krb5-bugs
