[2860] in Kerberos
RE: export question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Lanciani)
Wed Oct 13 19:50:19 1993
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 93 19:34:17 EDT
From: ddl@das.harvard.edu (Dan Lanciani)
To: kaufman@zk3.dec.com, marc@MIT.EDU
Cc: kerberos@MIT.EDU
|From kaufman@zk3.dec.com Wed Oct 13 16:14:33 1993
|
|I chose my words carefully because I was trying to be helpful while
|dancing around the fact that I don't fully understand the process (I
|claim no one does)
Probably no ten combined do either :)
|and I do know more than I'm allowed to say (for
|company confidential reasons, not national security laws). This
|coupled with strong opinions that might make my company uncomfortable
|makes for some tortured prose.
|
|You are correct that we did not get an export license per se but rather
|a level of assurance that our product fell under one of the general
|export licenses under circumstances that I believe could fairly be
|described as "getting approval".
Great, that's the only distinction I was looking for. It's not the
approval that makes it ok, but the fact that it's ok that makes for
the approval.
|I'm not prepared to say more without getting permission.
Well, if you do please post!
|I wish you
|luck and hope (for the sake of your sanity) that your interest is
|theoretical rather than practical.
I seem to have lost the posting that started this thread, but my
impression was that somebody somewhere had a practical interest.
Maybe I'm confused, though, and it was all an intellectual exercise
in futility. [Good Wheel of Fortune before & after clue :]
Dan Lanciani
ddl@harvard.edu
