[11358] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: The whole CIX concept is flawed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Wed Mar 30 08:58:29 1994
From: karl@mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
To: tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 01:08:53 -0600 (CST)
Cc: com-priv@lists.psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199403300114.RAA24205@netcom9.netcom.com> from "Glenn S. Tenney" at Mar 29, 94 05:14:31 pm
> At 12:19 PM 3/29/94 -0500, Christopher Davis wrote:
> >Connection directly to the CIX is not required ...
>
> hmmm... The CIX agreement reads:
>
> 6. Member will provide a circuit, at its own expense,
> from a location of its choice to a CIX router selected
> by mutual agreement, or other topologies and
> implementations specified by the Board of Directors.
>
> So, I guess those that don't connect directly to the CIX have somehow
> gotten some agreement by the Board for a variance ?????
A passthrough connection <IS> a circuit, provided at the member's expense,
to a CIX router selected by mutual agreement of all parties involved. :-)
It doesn't say <DIRECT> circuit.
--
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.COM) | MCSNet - Full Internet Connectivity (shell,
Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | PPP, SLIP and more) in Chicago and 'burbs.
Voice/FAX: [+1 312 248-8649] | Email "info@mcs.com". MCSNet is a CIX member.
