[543] in ad-lib
Re: Sigh. More Expansion Table
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Young )
Thu May 4 14:07:48 1995
To: Eric Celeste <efc@MIT.EDU>
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 4 May 95 14:06:29
From: gyoung@MIT.EDU (Grant Young )
Wouldn't work. In fact, this is a problem with the tables rather than the
expansion table idea. You can only have one call prefix on an PIECE. I
presume that the example you cited is why you want it. We decided in table
talk that theses that were on microfiche (as all are eventually) would have
the MCRFORMS collection and THESIS call prefix. We couldn't fit the fact
that they are FICHE into this scheme. We decided that the fact they were
theses was more important to using qualifiers than the fact that they were
fiche.
Were it possible all we would have to do is specify that the call prefix
line allow multiple values.
-- Grant
