[354] in ad-lib
Re: That's What We're Doing!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Celeste)
Tue Apr 18 15:52:10 1995
To: wpowers@MIT.EDU
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Apr 1995 12:40:56 EDT."
<9504141640.AA02267@cacciatore.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 15:51:32 EDT
From: Eric Celeste <efc@MIT.EDU>
Walter asks...
> I assume we will de-include 510's - what's the story with these anyway?
I don't feel like we came to a definite conclusion in the "index
everything" discussion. There seemed to still be an open question about
how this would affect system resources (diskspace, system responsiveness,
too-manny-hits complaints from the system).
In any case, when I argue for indexing everything, I mean everything we
plan to display on a brief or full record. Are we planning to display the
510's? If so, then perhaps they should be NW searchable. If not, I would
not index them either.
...Eric
