[265] in ad-lib

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Testing

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sarah Mitchell)
Sun Apr 2 14:32:16 1995

To: bog-lib@MIT.EDU
Cc: ad-cat@MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1995 14:32:06 EDT
From: Sarah Mitchell <smitchel@MIT.EDU>

I guess this is an example of why minutes are helpful.  I certainly didn't
come away from the BOG meeting thinking that each functional group was
going to wait until Grant and the testing coordinators discussed the 
testing of each functional area before we began testing. Given the
tight time schedule, I thought  Grant and  testing coordinators would
only have time to figure out cross functional testing.  
Ad-cat is ready to start functional testing this coming week. We are
using the User's Guide and the RFP as our outlines for testing and 
the test form can be keyed to either.  We modelled our plan following
the guidelines that Charlene and Grant discussed at the 3/22 BOG meeting.  
--SGM


------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Fri, 31 Mar 95 18:04:06
From:    mgm@MIT.EDU (Marilyn McSweeney )
To:      gyoung@MIT.EDU
cc:      bog-lib@MIT.EDU, acq2@MIT.EDU
Subject: Testing Group

Hi, Grant:  When I reported on the BOG/Matt discussion in our ACQ2 meeting 
on 3/30, I discovered that we had some different recollections about what 
the purpose of the Testing Group was going to be.  Here's what some of us 
remembered from the BOG meeting of 3/23:

Group to be composed of Grant and testing coordinators from the different 
functions would be convened very soon to

1.  discuss and share testing strategy for the different functional areas, 
	recognizing that testing might not be "one size fits all".
2.  design an appropriate test reporting form(s)
3.  decide how to test across functions
4.  discuss how to fit in the RFP with the Users Guide as an outline of 
	what to test
5.  insure that whatever "test plan" we develop meets Institute audit 	
requirements, as well as system acceptance.

This may be phrased badly, but you probably get the idea of what we were 
thinking.  Some folks had this broad view, while others were thinking that 
the testing group was primarily going to stick to no. 3 on the list above. 
Can you provide some clarification for us?   I know the Ad-Cat group has 
already done some good work on this, and we've got some ideas, but were 
uncertain how far to go before the group was convened...  Thanks, MGM     


------- End of Forwarded Message


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post