[25997] in resnet
Re: What Antivirus program do you use?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Wilson)
Mon Feb 28 07:59:12 2011
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba5bb861e83c81049d5737b2
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9OtHmpZYSmb+FVyK8_ZcX1G6XcO9JyJOThG3G@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 07:56:52 -0500
Reply-To: Resnet Forum <RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu>
From: Robert Wilson <rwilson@MCCALLIE.ORG>
To: RESNET-L@listserv.nd.edu
In-Reply-To: <4D6B1342.1090909@utc.edu>
--90e6ba5bb861e83c81049d5737b2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
It is my understanding that one can install it standalone without
management. We haven't attempted that yet.
Here is a thread about this that might help.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/FCSNext/thread/b78e9d43-fb91-470a-9450-d5fa7e0e4a69
Robert
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu> wrote:
> On 2/27/2011 5:10 PM, Robert Wilson wrote:
> > Microsoft updated Forefront Client Security to Forefront Endpoint
> > Protection (FEP). To centrally manage FEP, one needs SCCM which
> > requires its own license and CALs. Since we don't have SCCM, this is a
> > major issue for us.
>
> Is this "absolutely true" or just a preferred deployment scheme?
>
> I ask because I recall hearing the same things about Forefront (the
> current/old one) until some "standalone installers" surfaced. The only
> dependencies after that point are the periodic updates (hooked through
> windowsupdate/microsoftupdate).
>
> Jeff
>
--
Robert Wilson, McCallie School, Chattanooga, TN
___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.
To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________
--90e6ba5bb861e83c81049d5737b2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is my understanding that one can install it standalone without managemen=
t. We haven't attempted that yet.<div><br></div><div>Here is a thread a=
bout this that might help.</div><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://socia=
l.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/FCSNext/thread/b78e9d43-fb91-470a-9450=
-d5fa7e0e4a69">http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/FCSNext/thr=
ead/b78e9d43-fb91-470a-9450-d5fa7e0e4a69</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Robert</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb =
27, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jeff Kell <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jef=
f-kell@utc.edu">jeff-kell@utc.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On 2/27/2011 5:10 PM, Robert Wilson wrote:<br>
> Microsoft updated Forefront Client Security to Forefront Endpoint<br>
> Protection (FEP). To centrally manage FEP, one needs SCCM which<br>
> requires its own license and CALs. Since we don't have SCCM, this =
is a<br>
> major issue for us.<br>
<br>
</div>Is this "absolutely true" or just a preferred deployment sc=
heme?<br>
<br>
I ask because I recall =A0hearing the same things about Forefront (the<br>
current/old one) until some "standalone installers" surfaced. =A0=
The only<br>
dependencies after that point are the periodic updates (hooked through<br>
windowsupdate/microsoftupdate).<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Jeff<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Robert Wilson, M=
cCallie School, Chattanooga, TN<br>
___________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the ResNet-L mailing list.
<p>
To subscribe, unsubscribe or search the archives,
go to http://LISTSERV.ND.EDU/archives/resnet-l.html
___________________________________________________
--90e6ba5bb861e83c81049d5737b2--
