[535] in UA Senate

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Bylaws Maintenance

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Hawkins)
Mon Apr 5 02:12:36 2010

Reply-To: hwkns@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <4BB973C0.2000409@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 02:12:33 -0400
From: Daniel Hawkins <hwkns@MIT.EDU>
To: Tim Stumbaugh <ua-speaker@mit.edu>
Cc: UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu>

--0016368e29820073ef0483773793
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For some reason this was caught by my spam filter...  Anyway, I spoke with
Tim about all of these earlier today and they make sense to me.  I'm all fo=
r
it.

Tim, the second and fourth That clauses need quotation marks around the
quoted text.

-hwkns


On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Tim Stumbaugh <ua-speaker@mit.edu> wrote:

> Here are my justifications for each of the that clauses.
> (I killed the senator appointment part after it was suggested to me that =
it
> is not the UA's responsibility to make sure that a constituency is
> represented =97 that's the constituency's job):
>
> First that clause (voting methods):
> I'm just trying to have the bylaws reflect what actually goes down in
> Senate. I'd also like to add flexibility for using different voting metho=
ds
> to improve efficiency.
>
> Second that clause (removal of absentee balloting):
> RONR strongly recommends against this. I think it goes against the spirit
> of Senate.
>
> Third that clause (removal of "non voting"):
> These words imply that Senate is not allowed to vote to suspend the rules=
,
> adjourn or any other incidental things that come up during a meeting. Tha=
t's
> sort of ... awkward. The last part of that clause already ensures that we
> only do budgets.
>
> Fourth that clause (nomcomm stuff):
> This is sort of what we've been going off of this year, so I'd just like =
to
> clarify it. There are also a couple of grammar things I clarified.
>
> Fifth that clause (amendment):
> In RONR, things that are on the table at the end of a meeting fall to the
> floor at the end of that meeting. This is not really what we want, and th=
is
> just clarifies it.
>
> So yeah, if you have any questions, let me know. Thanks,
> --
> -Tim
> "Can you put the past away?"
>

--0016368e29820073ef0483773793
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For some reason this was caught by my spam filter...=A0 Anyway, I spoke wit=
h Tim about all of these earlier today and they make sense to me.=A0 I&#39;=
m all for it.<br><br>Tim, the second and fourth That clauses need quotation=
 marks around the quoted text.<br>
<br>-hwkns<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:2=
3 AM, Tim Stumbaugh <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ua-speaker@mit.=
edu">ua-speaker@mit.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,=
 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Here are my justifications for each of the that clauses.<br>
(I killed the senator appointment part after it was suggested to me that it=
 is not the UA&#39;s responsibility to make sure that a constituency is rep=
resented =97 that&#39;s the constituency&#39;s job):<br>
<br>
First that clause (voting methods):<br>
I&#39;m just trying to have the bylaws reflect what actually goes down in S=
enate. I&#39;d also like to add flexibility for using different voting meth=
ods to improve efficiency.<br>
<br>
Second that clause (removal of absentee balloting):<br>
RONR strongly recommends against this. I think it goes against the spirit o=
f Senate.<br>
<br>
Third that clause (removal of &quot;non voting&quot;):<br>
These words imply that Senate is not allowed to vote to suspend the rules, =
adjourn or any other incidental things that come up during a meeting. That&=
#39;s sort of ... awkward. The last part of that clause already ensures tha=
t we only do budgets.<br>

<br>
Fourth that clause (nomcomm stuff):<br>
This is sort of what we&#39;ve been going off of this year, so I&#39;d just=
 like to clarify it. There are also a couple of grammar things I clarified.=
<br>
<br>
Fifth that clause (amendment):<br>
In RONR, things that are on the table at the end of a meeting fall to the f=
loor at the end of that meeting. This is not really what we want, and this =
just clarifies it.<br>
<br>
So yeah, if you have any questions, let me know. Thanks,<br><font color=3D"=
#888888">
-- <br>
-Tim<br>
&quot;Can you put the past away?&quot;<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><div style=3D"visibility: hidden; display: in=
line;" id=3D"avg_ls_inline_popup"></div><style type=3D"text/css">#avg_ls_in=
line_popup {  position:absolute;  z-index:9999;  padding: 0px 0px;  margin-=
left: 0px;  margin-top: 0px;  width: 240px;  overflow: hidden;  word-wrap: =
break-word;  color: black;  font-size: 10px;  text-align: left;  line-heigh=
t: 13px;}</style>

--0016368e29820073ef0483773793--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post