[511] in UA Senate
Re: Senate Bylaws Maintenance Bill
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Stumbaugh)
Sun Apr 4 19:05:16 2010
In-Reply-To: <4BB914EF.1000900@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 19:05:07 -0400
From: Tim Stumbaugh <stum@MIT.EDU>
To: Alex Dehnert <adehnert@mit.edu>, UA Senate <ua-senate@mit.edu>
I was thinking that if people really don't like it the first time, we
save a week. I'm fine with just having the dereference to the table
and just say it must appear on the agenda at two separate meetings.
On 4/4/10, Alex Dehnert <adehnert@mit.edu> wrote:
> Can you say anything about why you want a two-thirds majority at each
> meeting? That seems like it will add unnecessary overhead to the
> process. I think that the idea behind requiring it sit on the table for
> a week is to avoid surprising people who might care, and I don't think
> requiring an affirmative vote at each meeting helps that any.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
--
-Tim
"There is no emotion, there is peace."
