[99926] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How Not to Multihome
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Tue Oct 9 11:26:36 2007
In-Reply-To: <70EC72941042AA48ABE651C40408D9C9863B@hal.photon.com>
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:25:22 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Oct 9, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>
>>>> If you do you have permission from the owner of the block, you
>>>> Should Not Announce it.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>
>> I stated above that you should not announce another provider's space
>> without their permission, and you specifically agreed. Here you are
>> talking about that space being announced without the owner's
>> knowledge. Make up your mind.
>>
>> We both agree that announcing another provider's space without their
>> consent is a Very Bad Thing. I doubt you will find people willing to
>> post here to the contrary. If the owner _does_ know the space is
>> being announced, the edge filters are no different whether it is
>> originated in the second upstream's ASN or an ASN owned by the
>> customer.
>>
>> So again, I ask, how is that different?
> You'll note that you left a word out above. He's agreeing that
> even if
> you do have permission, you shouldn't announce space from another
> provider.
Type-o's suck. Thanx for pointing it out.
Sorry for the confusion.
Justin, if Provider A _has_ permission from Provider B to announce a
prefix, do you believe Provider A should be allowed to announce the
prefix?
--
TTFN,
patrick
