[99925] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: How Not to Multihome
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jamie Bowden)
Tue Oct 9 08:25:28 2007
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:15:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <75CCBDEB-0B90-4562-9FDA-31F355BADA4B@ianai.net>
From: "Jamie Bowden" <jamie@photon.com>
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>, "nanog" <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick W. Gilmore
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:33 PM
To: nanog
Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore
Subject: Re: How Not to Multihome
On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> If you do you have permission from the owner of the block, you =20
>> Should Not Announce it.
>
> Agreed.
>
I stated above that you should not announce another provider's space =20
without their permission, and you specifically agreed. Here you are =20
talking about that space being announced without the owner's =20
knowledge. Make up your mind.
We both agree that announcing another provider's space without their =20
consent is a Very Bad Thing. I doubt you will find people willing to =20
post here to the contrary. If the owner _does_ know the space is =20
being announced, the edge filters are no different whether it is =20
originated in the second upstream's ASN or an ASN owned by the customer.
So again, I ask, how is that different?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
You'll note that you left a word out above. He's agreeing that even if
you do have permission, you shouldn't announce space from another
provider.
Jamie Bowden
--=20
"It was half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold"
Hunter S Tolkien "Fear and Loathing in Barad Dur"
Iain Bowen <alaric@alaric.org.uk>
