[99831] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 5 14:12:06 2007
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:56:48 +0200."
<20071005184945.V46853@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:10:11 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1191607811_2884P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:56:48 +0200, Mohacsi Janos said:
> controller can force enable/disable. I don't see how RIAA can lobby for
> switching off privacy enhancement - disabling certain component of the
> operating system?.
Consider the fact that they lobbied *and got* 17 USC 512 takedowns, and
the DMCA anti-circumvention clause.
Still don't see how they could lobby for it?
--==_Exmh_1191607811_2884P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFHBn4DcC3lWbTT17ARAicPAKCKYN4TjepesGir2xv5miHQlMq7pwCeMXFh
NymKSBWPtZEfBnZ8zOWgYy8=
=hsIj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1191607811_2884P--
