[99826] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 5 12:43:22 2007
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:42:05 +0200."
<20071005174053.K46853@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:28:07 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1191601687_2884P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:42:05 +0200, Mohacsi Janos said:
> Except if you are using privacy enhanced ipv6 addresses a la RFC 3041
Which is more likely:
1) The RIAA successfully lobbies for a network that basically prohibits rfc3041.
2) The consumers successfully lobby for a network that permits/requires rfc3041.
(My point was that at least in the US, the "consumer is king" mantra has been
a crock for several years - witness the incredible range and speeds of our
broadband choices, the whole "net neutrality" thing. If forced into a choice
between what the RIAA wants and what consumers want, I think we know what
most last-mile providers are going to do.....)
--==_Exmh_1191601687_2884P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFHBmYXcC3lWbTT17ARAr+1AJ9RkuffhBRMKitZoRaG7smkAIAoYACgvln/
ioGDuXp7U4rEEoZpKG3lDWI=
=CVfA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1191601687_2884P--
