[99723] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Wed Oct 3 04:13:32 2007
In-Reply-To: <878x6l2nhw.fsf@pirx.pps.jussieu.fr>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:32:36 +0200
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 2-okt-2007, at 23:52, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> But proxying can be that 80% solution and tunneling IPv4 over IPv6
>> can be a 100% solution so we don't have to raise NAT-PT from the
>> dead.
> Not until there's a protocol for autoconfiguring an HTTP proxy, and a
> protocol for autoconfiguring an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunnel.
If only there were a group of engineers tasked to write internet
standards like this...
