[99016] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lincoln Dale)
Tue Aug 28 21:28:28 2007
From: "Lincoln Dale" <ltd@interlink.com.au>
To: "'Donald Stahl'" <don@calis.blacksun.org>
Cc: "'Eric Gauthier'" <eric@roxanne.org>,
"'William Herrin'" <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:27:09 +1000
In-Reply-To: <20070828203645.U27356@calis.blacksun.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> > agree that this isn't "ideal", however Cisco has always been very specific
> > about the h/w FIB & adjacency table sizes on the hardware in question.
> > i know that vendor bashing is a sport in this list, but....
>
> Can you please point out where I can find this information ...
The Sup720 datasheet covers the capabilities (see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_data_sheet09186a
0080159856.html).
I got that (cisco.com) URL from the google search 'Supervisor 720 data sheet'.
I agree that the Sup32 datasheet
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_data_sheet0900a
ecd801c5cab.html) is less specific that it perhaps should be, but it does
clearly talk about what "policy feature card" is onboard and from the same
document hierarchy there is a link to 'Policy Feature Card-3B' which has the
same data as the Sup720 datasheet on PFC3B.
cheers,
lincoln.
NB. in my post there was a thinko, i incorrectly said "most-specific-prefixes
first", i meant "least-specific-prefixes first".
