[99015] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Donald Stahl)
Tue Aug 28 20:57:20 2007
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Donald Stahl <don@calis.blacksun.org>
To: Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au>
Cc: "'Eric Gauthier'" <eric@roxanne.org>,
"'William Herrin'" <herrin-nanog@dirtside.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <069c01c7e9d1$3bebbc10$046f09cb@ltdbeast>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> agree that this isn't "ideal", however Cisco has always been very specific
> about the h/w FIB & adjacency table sizes on the hardware in question.
> i know that vendor bashing is a sport in this list, but....
Can you please point out where I can find this information ...
The only place I found information on the PFC3B was on a random page
for the SUP 720-3B. I was completely unable to find the information on a
Sup32 page.
Now maybe my search technique isn't up to snuff- but I would hope I could
find this information after searching for a couple of hours- I couldn't.
I'm sure the information is on Cisco's site somewhere- but I honestly
think that they could be a LOT more forward about it- rather then just
very specific about it.
-Don
