|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:12:21 -0400 From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net> Reply-To: deepak@ai.net To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> CC: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <200708221446.l7MEkJuh036008@lava.sentex.ca> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu > Actually, in my case I dont think it would help because 577 has some > sort of paid agreement with teleglobe and probably a very cheap (or even > zero $$$) agreement with Cogent. So I dont think they would let me > influence their exit path to make them pay Teleglobe more money :) Since AS577 keeps coming up in this discussion. They certainly could have adjusted their routing during this event if they felt their customers/business were being negatively impacted. If it didn't meet that threshold, who are we to judge what is good for their customers/business?? The Internet is not something you can provide total quality assurance on while many organizations have various definitions for words like "total", "quality", and "assurance". Deepak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |