[98218] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Thu Jul 26 06:29:10 2007
In-Reply-To: <20070726101858.GO14059@MrServer.telecomplete.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:21:59 -0400
To: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox@packetrade.com>,
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
From: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 11:18 AM +0100 7/26/07, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
>
>um, so thats consistent with what i said.. in fact it implies only a very small number of organisations need to pay close attention and those are the ones best suited to implementing policy changes to ensure their users continue to have a good service
>
>this means 90% of orgs can probably wait and see what the 10% do first..
Completely incorrect. In order that we can continue to have
reasonable routing growth during new customer add, those
10% need to move to IPv6. While you don't have to move
your entire infrastructure to IPv6, you need to add IPv6 to
the public-facing servers that you'd like to still be Internet
connected.
/John
