[97906] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier Recommendations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jul 17 12:01:32 2007
To: Daniel <accesss801@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:39:30 MDT."
<24535bbb0707161439t3b05fc9fi49aa43ad0238d4a1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:55:37 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1184687737_3353P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:39:30 MDT, Daniel said:
> 1) A single carrier for global connectivity to all sites (mpls etc)
>
> 2) A single carrier for global regional connectivity, and in
> country/regional carriers for all local offices that funnel back to regional
> aggregation points.
Is multihoming and/or traffic engineering over multiple connections a
requirement? Should it be, or is "multiple links to one sufficiently big
upstream AS" good enough?
--==_Exmh_1184687737_3353P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFGnOZ5cC3lWbTT17ARAveGAJ9rYt5ob2QEin9sdzIXCyALDUUuPQCcCX3Z
94yboQb4gtIWQf7vTIDNoq8=
=3C1o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1184687737_3353P--
