[96913] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Vegoda)
Tue May 29 13:37:07 2007
In-Reply-To: <9737182E-A0A8-40DC-94A3-EBB421B5FA7B@virtualized.org>
Cc: jordi.palet@consulintel.es, Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:17:49 +0200
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 29 May 2007, at 5:22pm, David Conrad wrote:
[...]
>> they should not notice it.
>
> They shouldn't, but they will. Having had the fun of trying to
> figure out why I lost connectivity to a site (then realizing it was
> because I had connected via IPv6 instead of IPv4 and IPv6
> routing ... changed), the current IPv6 infrastructure is, shall we
> say, not quite production ready.
They already do. This popped up in my feed reader today:
http://ask.metafilter.com/63532/Trouble-with-Firefox
it ends with this comment: "If your hosting provider is serving your
domain with IPv6, then it is time to find a new provider."
Regards,
Leo
