[96912] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris L. Morrow)
Tue May 29 13:30:38 2007
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:16:24 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
In-reply-to:
<D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B06C97E2@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: michael.dillon@bt.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 29 May 2007 michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
>
>
> > > > For core links it should IMHO be mostly possible to keep them
> > > > IPv4/IPv6
> > > > dual-stack.
> > >
> > > What's wrong with MPLS in the core and 6PE at the edge?
> > >
> > > Right there you have two possible tactics that are worthy of being
> > > publicly discussed and compared.
> >
> > stewart bamford gave a good presentation about this very
> > thing 4 nanogs ago (or maybe 5)> There are some support
> > issues to keep in mind of course.
>
> Perhaps it was this one?
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0510/pdf/bamford.pdf
indeed, thanks!
>
> Note that Level3 did choose to use 6PE for their deployment rather than
> dual-stacking.
>
I think he stated that initial deployment was 6pe, but they had planned to
re-deploy native v6 at a later date.
