[96565] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jo Rhett)
Mon May 14 14:00:15 2007
In-Reply-To: <46483A5A.2080704@entagroup.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:51:45 -0700
To: James Blessing <james.blessing@entagroup.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Irrelevant of the BT specifics...
> Jo Rhett wrote:
>> We're considering null-routing all BT netblocks. I'm wondering
>> how many
>> others have already come to the same conclusion?
On May 14, 2007, at 3:30 AM, James Blessing wrote:
> No something I would recommend to anyone that has any commercial
> sense.
In our particular market it wouldn't hurt us very badly, but ...
This is a specific problem that I think affects us all, and it
bothers me greatly that large organizations like BT are allowed to
give the finger to everyone on this list because they don't have to
worry about being nullrouted on a global basis. Knowing this, they
are allowed to understaff and otherwise ignore their abuse help
desks. Because their size allows them to not care.
I'd love to find a way to change that equation.
--
Jo Rhett
senior geek
Silicon Valley Colocation
Support Phone: 408-400-0550
