[96522] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Sat May 12 19:22:23 2007
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 01:19:25 +0200
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <bb0e440a0705112024s3d339712i7070a6b4a219742e@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
* ops.lists@gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian) [Sat 12 May 2007, 05:25 CEST]:
> On 5/11/07, K K <kkadow@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Probably 98% of the mailbox is from are spammers who've harvested or
>> randomly targeted abuse@ addresses for male enhancement, maybe 1.99%
> So? A little filtering should handle a lot of that, procmail even.
> At least to file the obvious crap into a different folder that can be
> looked at and blown away
Difficult, as spam complaints generally include the original spam and
thus trigger SpamAssassin (almost) just as hard.
Otherwise, looking forward to your 98% effective procmail recipe
-- Niels.
