[96391] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BOGON Announcement question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris L. Morrow)
Mon May 7 14:47:46 2007
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 18:45:38 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>
In-reply-to: <D8B7EDD1-669D-4E1E-B102-C6B652566C54@tcb.net>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Danny McPherson wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> >>> Collector: CIXP
> >>> Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2
> >>> Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z
> >>> Peer: 192.65.185.140
> >>> Origin: 29222
> >>>
> >>> My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the
> >>> announcement?
> >>
> >> because everyone with enough clue to watch what they receive has
> >> filters in
> >> place to prevent their hearing it?
> >
> > And even if they didn't, what important IP space in that /2 is not
> > covered by more specifics?
>
> A whole lot if any of those more specific were withdrawn and
> the /2 were to pick up for them...
BGP routing table entry for 2.0.0.0/24, version 686581
Paths: (19 available, best #17, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
7018 1299 34211 41856 41856, (received-only)
12.0.1.63 from 12.0.1.63 (12.0.1.63)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
Community: 7018:5000
what about these fun things? :)
