|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <F9E7F5F5-C497-4946-B3EB-C4F2D4C9EB85@ianai.net> From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:39:16 -0600 To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu> Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu On Apr 30, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > >>> Collector: CIXP >>> Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2 >>> Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z >>> Peer: 192.65.185.140 >>> Origin: 29222 >>> >>> My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the >>> announcement? >> >> because everyone with enough clue to watch what they receive has >> filters in >> place to prevent their hearing it? > > And even if they didn't, what important IP space in that /2 is not > covered by more specifics? A whole lot if any of those more specific were withdrawn and the /2 were to pick up for them... -danny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |