[95752] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gadi Evron)
Tue Apr 3 07:19:35 2007
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 06:06:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
To: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
Cc: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4612204B.3090906@nrg4u.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> Gadi Evron wrote:
> > What are your thoughts on basic suggestions such as:
> > 1. Allowing registrars to terminate domains based on abuse, rather than
> > just fake contact details.
>
> Are you crazy or what? Ever heard of due process? What is abuse? Who
> decides that? Office of pre-crime?
Now you're talking. What *would* be due process, and if it happens, how do
we follow up?
>
> In the end the cure is worse than the diseas (by abusing the anti-abuse
> system. DMCA abuse anyone? Or the stupid bogons list so many people
> forget to update every friggin time IANA allocated a new /8 to one of
> the RIRs?)
>
> > 3. For true emergencies threatening the survivability of the system,
> > shoudln't we be able to black-list a domain in the core?
>
> Never ever should anything like that be done at the core. Especially
> when you try to fix a problem that isn't even at the core but in one
> vendors operating system without a proper fix after having known it
> for more than five month.
>
> Gadi, you're barking up the wrong tree. Try to hit Microsoft instead.
>
> --
> Andre
>
