[95749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andre Oppermann)
Tue Apr 3 05:38:34 2007
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:37:15 +0200
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
To: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
Cc: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0704022045121.20288-100000@linuxbox.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Gadi Evron wrote:
> What are your thoughts on basic suggestions such as:
> 1. Allowing registrars to terminate domains based on abuse, rather than
> just fake contact details.
Are you crazy or what? Ever heard of due process? What is abuse? Who
decides that? Office of pre-crime?
In the end the cure is worse than the diseas (by abusing the anti-abuse
system. DMCA abuse anyone? Or the stupid bogons list so many people
forget to update every friggin time IANA allocated a new /8 to one of
the RIRs?)
> 3. For true emergencies threatening the survivability of the system,
> shoudln't we be able to black-list a domain in the core?
Never ever should anything like that be done at the core. Especially
when you try to fix a problem that isn't even at the core but in one
vendors operating system without a proper fix after having known it
for more than five month.
Gadi, you're barking up the wrong tree. Try to hit Microsoft instead.
--
Andre
