[95119] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Ortega)
Wed Feb 28 17:02:29 2007
From: "Eric Ortega" <eric.ortega@midco.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:01:35 -0600
In-Reply-To: <002201c759d2$609e4da0$6501a8c0@COM23342>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I'd like to thank the group for the responses and help with this issue. =
I
find it ironic that Randy's study actually uses 96 space.=20
Thanks again!
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of =
Eric
Ortega
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:17 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: 'James Blessing'
Subject: RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
After I sent that mail I realized that I didn't give enough information.
96.2.0.1 is pingable from the net.
Thank you all for your quick response!
-----Original Message-----
From: James Blessing [mailto:james.blessing@entagroup.com]=20
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:28 AM
To: Eric Ortega
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Ortega wrote:
> I am a network engineer for Midcontinent Communications We are an ISP
> in the American Midwest. Recently, we were allocated a new network
> assignment: 96.2.0.0/16. We've been having major issues with sites=20
> still blocking this network. I normally wouldn't blanket post to the=20
> group, but I'm looking to hit as many direct network=20
> engineers/operators as possible. Would it be possible to have people=20
> do a quick check on their inbound filters?
Pingable IP address in that network please :)
- --
COO
Entanet International
T: 0870 770 9580
http://www.enta.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF4xiRR+KszLBLUT8RAnR/AJ43MzH5PUaTflUsPU95MUp4iuZolQCfcJAZ
Y6j4ipQBBseS/VhdvT8ry6c=3D
=3Dt+y8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
