[94104] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Lockhart)
Tue Jan 9 17:52:42 2007

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 22:45:30 +0000
From: Simon Lockhart <simon@slimey.org>
To: Gian Constantine <constantinegi@corp.earthlink.net>
Cc: Thomas Leavitt <thomas@thomasleavitt.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <D0BD9120-B198-48A4-8CBC-61D64FE01CB9@corp.earthlink.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 10:26:30PM -0500, Gian Constantine wrote:
> My contention is simple. The content providers will not allow P2P  
> video as a legal commercial service anytime in the near future.  
>
> Furthermore, most ISPs are going to side with the content providers  
> on this one. Therefore, discussing it at this point in time is purely  
> academic, or more so, diversionary.

In my experience, content providers want to use P2P because it "reduces" 
their distribution costs (in quotes, because I'm not convinced it does, in
the real world). Content providers don't care whether access providers like 
P2P or not, just whether it works or not.

On one hand, access providers are putting in place rate limiting or blocking
of P2P (subject to discussions of how effective those are), but on the other
hand, content providers are saying that P2P is the future...

Simon

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post