[91235] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Mon Jul 10 22:46:53 2006
In-Reply-To: <200607110218.k6B2IjoR007836@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:46:08 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Jul 10, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:00:11 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:48 PM, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:
>>
>>> Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused
>>> heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF.
>>> Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such
>>> as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus
>>> routes?
>>
>> Would anyone not filter those routes? Why wouldn't you filter to /7?
>
> Every growing season, a new crop of network engineers falls fresh from
> the tree, and must be picked up, polished, and clue imparted on the
> way to market.....
Well, then don't snip the most important clue in the post:
> Actually, I take that back. Why wouldn't you just get a feed from
> Cymru <http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html> ??
:-)
--
TTFN,
patrick
