[91234] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Mon Jul 10 22:03:46 2006
In-Reply-To: <F6EA7F9A7FE80C409B346B0B9FDC564901FB7637@hkghhtmsx01.in.reach.com>
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:00:11 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:48 PM, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:
> Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused
> heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF.
> Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such
> as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?
Would anyone not filter those routes? Why wouldn't you filter to /7?
Actually, I take that back. Why wouldn't you just get a feed from
Cymru <http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html> ??
--
TTFN,
patrick
