[90808] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Thu Jun 15 06:37:30 2006
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:37:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4491137E.5030504@ne-worcs.ac.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Chris Hills wrote:
> Unless I am missing something obvious, it seems like rfc 3069 (sub/super
> vlans) provides an easy (interim?) solution to this dilemma.
Some ciscos can do this as well (recent IOS). IP unnumbered and static
routes towards vlan interfaces means you can put customers in their own
vlan and still have them be part of a larger IP subnet spanning several
vlans.
Since it was Extreme that filed RFC3069 I seriously doubt Cisco will ever
implement it straight up.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
