[90805] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Hills)
Thu Jun 15 04:00:02 2006
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:59:58 +0100
From: Chris Hills <chills@ne-worcs.ac.uk>
To: Bill Nash <billn@odyssey.billn.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606141933520.3089@odyssey.billn.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Bill Nash wrote:
> Trying to migrate customers to their own vlan when they've been alloted
> IPs, willy nilly, across one of the bajillion /24's secondaried on the
> vlan interface drives me into an entire new dimension of pissed off.
Unless I am missing something obvious, it seems like rfc 3069 (sub/super
vlans) provides an easy (interim?) solution to this dilemma.
