[90447] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Wed May 24 15:51:26 2006
In-Reply-To: <200605241927.k4OJRuLE026055@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, nanog list <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Christian Kuhtz <christian@kuhtz.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:50:55 -0400
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On May 24, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:39:05 EDT, Christian Kuhtz said:
>
>> Now, now, Steinar, we all know that cannot be true. Case and point,
>> everyone has implemented RFC 3514, just because it has been published
>> as a standard.
>
> Actually, it's Informational rather than Standards Track.
Nitpicky bugger, good grief. ;-) It's an RFC, therefore it is
gospel. ;-)
> However, since
> there were patches for both a *BSD variant and Linux, we can
> probably scare
> up two interoperable implementations so we can move it along
> Standards Track. :)
Stop, Vladis, stop, you're scarying me.
;-)
