[90446] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed May 24 15:28:51 2006
To: Christian Kuhtz <christian@kuhtz.com>
Cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, nanog list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 May 2006 10:39:05 EDT."
<AE104BB6-6C21-434F-BA7E-DAADC03874AA@kuhtz.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:27:56 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1148498876_3852P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:39:05 EDT, Christian Kuhtz said:
> Now, now, Steinar, we all know that cannot be true. Case and point,
> everyone has implemented RFC 3514, just because it has been published
> as a standard.
Actually, it's Informational rather than Standards Track. However, since
there were patches for both a *BSD variant and Linux, we can probably scare
up two interoperable implementations so we can move it along Standards Track. :)
--==_Exmh_1148498876_3852P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFEdLO8cC3lWbTT17ARArG5AKD2aX28P9jMNy6kIqt+/6mNxemUBwCdGlWd
Ju/fphuqDBiqjESefhR+ij0=
=cVJt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1148498876_3852P--
