[9018] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging under non-disclosure?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Fri May 2 23:57:39 1997

Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 23:51:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gordon Cook <cook@netaxs.com>
To: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net>
cc: "'Stephen Balbach'" <stephen@clark.net>,
        "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>,
        "'inet-access@earth.com'" <inet-access@earth.com>,
        "'dave@oldcolo.com'" <dave@oldcolo.com>
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=You_Tools_Corp.%l=FNBDC1-970503022717Z-373@fnbdc1.youtools.com>

when they clean out all the competing backbones what is to prevent thenm
from doubling and then tripling your charges Dave?

************************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet               For subsc. pricing & more than
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA     ten megabytes of free material
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)              visit   http://cookreport.com/
Internet: cook@cookreport.com             On line speech of critics under
attack by Ewing NJ School Board, go to http://cookreport.com/sboard.shtml
************************************************************************


On Fri, 2 May 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote:

> Well said!
> 
> Gee, you mean that this *is* really a business??
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
> dave@fast.net (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
> FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:	Stephen Balbach [SMTP:stephen@clark.net]
> >Sent:	Friday, May 02, 1997 6:43 AM
> >To:	Gordon Cook
> >Cc:	nanog@merit.edu; inet-access@earth.com; dave@oldcolo.com
> >Subject:	Re: UUNET Pulling Peering Agreements & replacing them with charging
> >under non-disclosure?
> >
> >
> >> First it was AGIS (but who cares about AGIS?). Now UUNET. Tomorrow who?
> >> MCI? As UUNET and others of the big five move to consolidate their
> >> markets.......... let UUNET put the smaller national backbones against the
> >> wall and whom do the rest of ISP's have to rely on?   Those ISPs who did
> >> not get hit in UUNET's first round of cuts. Will you get it in the neck in
> >> the second or the third round?
> >
> >The only thing UUNET is cutting is Internet trees, and there are some who 
> >are protesting by hugging them. Clear out the chaff for next seasons 
> >crops. 
> >
> >Buying connectivity from an ISP who peers with UUNET, or buying direct
> >from UUNET, is a lot cheaper then building a national DS-3/OC-3 backbone
> >and trying to be default free - this is not about UUNET cuting throats,
> >it's about large and small ISP's examining thier business model. 
> >
> >
> >.stb
> >
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post