[89875] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School )
Tue Apr 11 14:29:25 2006
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Reply-To: froomkin@law.tm
To: Alexei Roudnev <alex@relcom.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, John Dupuy <jdupuy-list@socket.net>
In-Reply-To: <034601c65d84$ef276340$6401a8c0@alexh>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
<law professor> I'd really suggest that readers confirm this claim (that
intentional sending of false data with a malicious purpose is perfectly
acceptable) with a local lawyer before trying it at home or at work.</law
professor>
I also bet that the claim of widespread acceptability would fail badly if
we weigh countries by population. Or even connectivity.
Not to mention the fact that your packets might stray across borders
sometimes.
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
>
> It's legal to have broken NTP server in ANY country, and it's legal in most
> (by number) countries to send counter-attack (except USA as usual, where
> lawyers want to get their money and so do not allow people to self-defence).
>
--
http://www.icannwatch.org Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's warm here.<--
