[89874] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 11 13:52:59 2006
To: ahebert@pubnix.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:39 EDT."
<443B46F7.7020502@pubnix.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:52:29 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1144777949_3383P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:39 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
> >that creates new liability, and isn't realistic in today's litigious world.
> It is DIX resources/equipements... they are not oblige to offer
> reliable/secure/valide/etc services to anybody outside their clients.
>
> It like saying that blacklist services like spamcop should be liable
> for mail servers XYZ deleting your email.
Paul is speaking from experience, having dealt with altogether too many people
who *do* believe that services Spamcop should be liable...
Even if it isn't a *legal* liability where you're forced to pay out damages,
having to carry '$100,000 legal fees' on the balance sheet is an accounting
liability, not an asset....
--==_Exmh_1144777949_3383P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFEO+zdcC3lWbTT17ARAsi6AJ42GGsYBmvKLSjgJaBZ4dHVpRopcACgr4BT
pTSN7kxz/rVlaF2Cd/K1AnE=
=h24O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1144777949_3383P--
