[89294] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

AW: Italy orders ISPs to block sites

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tom)
Tue Mar 7 03:14:05 2006

From: "tom" <tier1@ncinet.de>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:13:21 +0100
In-Reply-To: <8C3173A17DF4B4FD9AF87712@odpwrbook.hq.netli.lan>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Hi Folks across the ocean..

I understand, that from an American point of view this kind of =
restriction
looks strange and is against your act of freedom, however here in Europe
gambling is a state controlled business that supports the state economy =
and
in most European countries gambling outside state controlled casinos is
simply illegal and forbidden by law.
So I doubt, that the European Court would really rule agaist this....
Each country has specific laws, that othewr nations do not not =
understand
and we all should accept that.
Imagine, if kids in the US would be able to order Cannabis from =
Online-shops
in the Netherlands (as it is leaglized there)through mail order? Would =
you
or your legislation agree to that?

See..

I hope you don't mind this commentary from a European...

Tom




-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] Im Auftrag von
Owen DeLong
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. M=E4rz 2006 08:54
An: Christopher L. Morrow; Marco d'Itri
Cc: NANOG
Betreff: Re: Italy orders ISPs to block sites


Singapore seems to force all of their ISPs to send all HTTP requests =
through
a proxy that has a set of rules defining sites you are not allowed to =
visit.

Owen


--On March 7, 2006 1:48:39 AM +0000 "Christopher L. Morrow"=20
<christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 06, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com> wrote:
>>
>> > It appears that Italy has ordered Italian ISPs to block access to a =

>> > number of Internet Gambling sites. It would be interesting to see=20
>> > how the Italian ISPs are handling this, what with dynamic DNS and=20
>> > all that...
>> So far, the method officially recommended by the government entity=20
>> involved with collecting the gambling fees has been to create fake=20
>> zones on the caching resolvers of the large consumer ISPs.
>
> good thing people use dns servers other than those put up by their ISP =

> :) when last faced with this situation, State-of-PA ChildPorn Law...=20
> Null routing the affected ip-addresses was the only 'good' solution :(
>
> -Chris



--
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably a
forgery.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post