[89140] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Todd Vierling)
Fri Mar 3 11:08:27 2006

Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:07:20 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <D3774A42-AA10-4059-9338-1B030947DC93@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> 3. Route processing and FIB lookups scale worse than linear

> 6. Moore can't go on forever, there are physical limitations

The funny part:  Those on this list who have cited Moore's Law don't seem to
have an understanding that it does not directly apply to custom routing
logic (since general-purpose CPUs are no longer fast enough to do the
lookups on the high end).  In addition, GP CPUs are no longer scaling
exponentially, but rather closer to quadratically and approaching linear.

In short, Moore's Law is dying, and even if it weren't, it is not a valid
argument for "let the swamp in".

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> <tv@pobox.com> <todd@vierling.name>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post