[88237] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Jan 26 01:23:05 2006
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>,
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:54:30 +0200."
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0601260752040.15682@netcore.fi>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:22:01 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1138256521_20023P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:54:30 +0200, Pekka Savola said:
> It'd be darn difficult to engineer a solution that would end up being
> deployed in any reasonable time if we don't know the requirements
> first.
Fortunately, when we know the requirements and engineer a solution, deployment
is straightforward. RFC2827, for example, has a stellar deployment record.
In other words - what is the business case for deploying this proposed
solution? I may be able to get things deployed at $WORK by arguing that
it's The Right Thing To Do, but at most shops an ROI calculation needs
to be attached to get movement....
--==_Exmh_1138256521_20023P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFD2GqJcC3lWbTT17ARAoDPAJ9aZM5Fxr+Tz4zTC5EVdR88e4J/kgCgm8e+
mIG/SNZ/dop/DcYShLL3iBo=
=iOns
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1138256521_20023P--
