[87487] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (chip)
Wed Dec 21 16:03:31 2005
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:03:05 -0500
From: chip <chip.gwyn@gmail.com>
To: Albert Meyer <from_nanog@corenap.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <43A9BB5A.1030106@corenap.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
------=_Part_37434_30706299.1135198985481
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On 12/21/05, Albert Meyer <from_nanog@corenap.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I
> looked
> around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind
> channels to
> organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the
> channel
> to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good
> idea?
>
> Andrew Kirch wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > william(at)elan.net wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
> >>
>
>
Actually, looks like #nanog on freenode is already registered as belonging
to NANOG:
/msg chanserv info #nanog
>chanserv< info #nanog
-ChanServ- Channel: #nanog
-ChanServ- Contact: Duke, last seen: 44 weeks 5 days (13h 25m 33s) ago
-ChanServ- Alternate: kerx, last seen: 18 weeks 6 days (14h 27m 0s) ago
-ChanServ- Registered: 2 years 27 weeks 2 days (5h 49m 57s) ago
-ChanServ- Topic: North American Network Operators Group
-ChanServ- Email: biodragon2002@hotmail.com
-ChanServ- Options: Secure, SecureOps
-ChanServ- Mode Lock: -s
--chip
--
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
------=_Part_37434_30706299.1135198985481
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 12/21/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sen=
dername">Albert Meyer</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:from_nanog@corenap.com">fro=
m_nanog@corenap.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8=
ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I l=
ooked<br>around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bin=
d channels to<br>organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this wou=
ld allow the channel
<br>to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a go=
od idea?<br><br>Andrew Kirch wrote:<br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--=
---<br>> Hash: SHA1<br>><br>> william(at)elan.net wrote:<br>>
<br>><br>>><br>>>I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nano=
g<br>>><br><br></blockquote></div><br>
Actually, looks like #nanog on freenode is already registered as belonging =
to NANOG:<br>
<br>
/msg chanserv info #nanog<br>
>chanserv< info #nanog<br>
-ChanServ- Channel: #nanog<br>
-ChanServ- Contact: Duke, last seen: 44 weeks=
5 days (13h 25m 33s) ago<br>
-ChanServ- Alternate: kerx, last seen: 18 weeks 6 days (1=
4h 27m 0s) ago<br>
-ChanServ- Registered: 2 years 27 weeks 2 days (5h 49m 57s) ago=
<br>
-ChanServ- Topic: North American =
Network Operators Group<br>
-ChanServ- Email: <a href=3D"mail=
to:biodragon2002@hotmail.com">biodragon2002@hotmail.com</a><br>
-ChanServ- Options: Secure, SecureOps<br>
-ChanServ- Mode Lock: -s<br><br>
--chip<br>
-- <br>Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not includ=
ed, etc....
------=_Part_37434_30706299.1135198985481--
