[87486] in North American Network Operators' Group
#nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Albert Meyer)
Wed Dec 21 15:30:55 2005
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:30:18 -0600
From: Albert Meyer <from_nanog@corenap.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <43A9A0EB.5010809@trelane.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked
around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to
organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel
to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea?
Andrew Kirch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
>>
