[85782] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com)
Mon Oct 17 10:14:28 2005
In-Reply-To: <17234.54324.276667.181642@roam.psg.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:15:21 +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> so, if we had a free hand and ignored the dogmas, what would we
> change about the v6 architecture to make it really deployable
> and scalable and have compatibility with and a transition path
> from v4 without massive kludging, complexity, and long term
> cost?
Isn't that GENI already out of the bottle?
http://www.nsf.gov/cise/geni/
http://www.ana.lcs.mit.edu/papers/PDF/Rethinking_2001.pdf
http://cfp.mit.edu/docs/overview.pdf
http://cfp.mit.edu/groups/internet/internet.html
Seems like there is enough interest in this to plan something
for NANOG 36 early next year.
--Michael Dillon
