[85754] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Loch)
Mon Oct 17 05:34:50 2005
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:25:40 -0400
From: Kevin Loch <kloch@hotnic.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510151646560.3396@sheen.jakma.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Paul Jakma wrote:
> And 6to4 obviously won't fly for long after the 4 tank runs dry.
Hopefully it won't need to at that point as it is only intended as
a transitional step.
I like the simplicity of 6to4 and the way it preserves end-to-end
addresses. If only there was a way to adapt it's stateless
automatic tunneling to solve the IPv6 multihoming/PI problem.
I took a quick hack at it and the result is interesting though
far from perfect:
http://kl.net/ipv6/pi-in-6.txt
- Kevin
