[85718] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Sun Oct 16 10:35:57 2005
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:40:53 MST."
<C52CBAEE-4EA6-4927-A366-187B690CB338@virtualized.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:35:13 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
# > but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always
# > said "no! we have to have end-to- end, and if we'd wanted
# > nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."
#
# Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle?
#
# Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again).
vj is a framing protocol. IP goes in, IP comes out. univerality is retained.
